|
October
16, 2007
National
Association for the Advancement of Chicano
Prosperity
by Mike S. Adams, Ph.D.
The
North Carolina NAACP has been a nearly useless
organization for years -- ever since the demise of
the KKK and racial segregation. Today, the only
remnants of racial segregation in North Carolina
come in the form of diversity initiatives in the
UNC system. And the killing of black innocents is
usually done by people in white lab coats -- all in
the name of a new civil right called "choice."
But, make no mistake about it; the NAACP misses
the days when white people really were doing a lot
of harm to black people. This is because the
organization needs to extort money from non-racist
white people to survive. And, clearly, non-racist
white people have more money than black people
despite the fact that the government launched a war
on poverty during the 1960s. The professors I work
with are planning to protest the war as well as the
government's occupation of substandard housing
projects just as soon as they can find a link to
the Bush administration.
But, for the time being, the NAACP is giving the
state of North Carolina two options related to a
race riot that took place in Wilmington the century
before the previous century -- 1898, to be exact:
1. The State can grant reparations to blacks, or 2.
The State can defend itself in a lawsuit brought by
the NAACP.
I first heard about this notion of reparations
for the 1898 Race Riots from a black professor at
UNC-Wilmington. He said I owed him money and I
could just give him my credit card for
compensation. But I wasn't able to give him my
credit card the one and only time I saw him in
public because he was drunk as hell and slobbering
all over a couple of white girls. For the record, I
don't think I should be giving him my credit card
if he's going to engage in racial discrimination by
slobbering exclusively on white girls. Black girls
need love, too (and, perhaps, reparations if they
don't get it from an obvious beneficiary of my
university's commitment to affirmative action).
Unfortunately, not everyone is laughing at the
notion of reparations for a race riot that happened
the century before the century before this one --
one that killed about a dozen people. In fact,
hundreds of people attended the NAACP's 64th annual
convention in Wilmington -- most of them supporting
the government's right to take money from people
who have never actually won a race riot and give it
to those who have never actually lost a race
riot.
According to the local Wilmington McTimes, one
member of the NAACP said "We're going to take you
to court North Carolina." And, sadly, national
NAACP board members are actually discussing how to
advance recommendations made by the state-appointed
1898 Wilmington Race Riot Commission.
The commission recommendations include: 1.
Government compensation of heirs of victims who can
prove loss via statutes. 2. Government
implementation of new redevelopment authority. 3.
Government imposed economic incentives to encourage
minority business. 4. Government imposed incentives
to encourage home ownership in the Northside and
Brooklyn areas, which were among the sites of race
rioting.
But other NAACP members want more. Lewin Manly
said he favors the state of North Carolina awarding
compensation funding for education. He also wants
government funding for subsidized housing. Other
voices at the NAACP conference said we must think
about what the race riots of 1898 have done to
"vast millions of people who are still crawling on
the ground trying to get up" adding "We need to
make amends for all of that."
While the NAACP was discussing more government
support of blacks for things that happened in 1898,
there was little discussion about the reality of
black entrepreneurship in the current century. The
reality is, of course, that all of the government
money awarded to blacks stays in the hands of
blacks for only a short time. Those drawing
government checks and living in government housing
spend the money in stores owned almost exclusively
by whites.
Put simply, white government officials give
money to black citizens to give it right back to
white business owners. That is why black progress
is about as common as feminist orgasm and safe
sodomy.
While blacks are trying to remedy this problem
by forcing the government to prop up black
businesses, they are being made to look foolish by
another minority group. Indeed, Hispanic businesses
are popping up in Wilmington faster than the
sentences I end prepositions with. Our Hispanic
brothers and sisters are doing this without
lobbying for government-mandated programs. They are
simply doing it with hard work.
There is a reason why so many Hispanic families
have made more progress since 1998 than many black
families have made since 1898: They come from a
culture of self-reliance rather than a culture of
victim hood.
By keeping blacks focused on their past, the
NAACP is robbing them of a chance to compete in the
present -- this to the delight of Hispanics willing
to seize on their missed opportunities. In some
ways, then, the future prosperity of the Chicano
population depends on the continued efforts of the
NAACP -- even though black leaders seem to be
unaware of the obvious connection.
The current situation may be ironic but it is
not necessarily a bad thing. Though they need less
help in their advancement, I guess Chicanos are
colored people, too.
Adams
Archive
©2007 by Mike S. Adams and reprinted with
permission of the author.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|
Order
Dr. Adams' Book
|
|
|
An irreverent, disturbing look at
higher education through the eyes of a
former Leftist radical whose
disillusionment with the politics of
diversity and political correctness turned
him into a "token" campus
Conservative.
Portrayed by the university
administration and mainstream media as a
"flame-thrower," Professor Adams lampoons
sacred cows such as affirmative action,
Gay Pride, cultural sensitivity training,
multi-culturalism, censorship and other
"sins" committed in the name of academic
freedom.
Dr. Mike S. Adams, a professor of
Criminal Justice at the University of
North Carolina at Wilmington, is a regular
contributor to conservative web and print
publications. He recently defended himself
against a charge of libel in a
high-profile free-speech controversy that
landed him on numerous top-ranked national
TV and radio shows, including Rush
Limbaugh, CNN and Hannity &
Colmes.
|
Welcome
to the Ivory Tower of Babel: Confessions
of a Conservative College
Professor,
by
Mike S. Adams
|
Mike
S. Adams was born in Columbus, Mississippi on
October 30, 1964. While a student at Clear Lake
High School in Houston, TX, his team won the state
5A soccer championship. He graduated from C.L.H.S.
in 1983 with a 1.8 GPA. He was ranked 734 among a
class of 740, largely as a result of flunking
English all four years of high school. After
obtaining an Associate's degree in psychology from
San Jacinto College, he moved on to Mississippi
State University where he joined the Sigma Chi
Fraternity. While living in the fraternity house,
his GPA rose to 3.4, allowing him to finish his
B.A., and then to pursue a Master's in Psychology.
In 1990, he turned down a chance to pursue a PhD in
psychology from the University of Georgia, opting
instead to remain at Mississippi State to study
Sociology/Criminology. This decision was made
entirely on the basis of his reluctance to quit his
night job as member of a musical duo. Playing music
in bars and at fraternity parties and weddings
financed his education. He also played for free
beer.
Upon
getting his doctorate in 1993, Adams, then an
atheist and a Democrat, was hired by UNC-Wilmington
to teach in the criminal justice program. A few
years later, Adams abandoned his atheism and also
became a Republican. He also nearly abandoned
teaching when he took a one-year leave of absence
to study law at UNC-Chapel Hill in 1998. After
returning to teach at UNC-Wilmington, Adams won the
Faculty Member of the Year award (issued by the
Office of the Dean of Students) for the second time
in 2000.
After
his involvement in a well publicized free speech
controversy in the wake of the 911 terror attacks,
Adams became a vocal critic of the diversity
movement in academia. After making appearances on
shows like Hannity and Colmes, the O'Reilly Factor,
and Scarborough Country, Adams was asked to write a
column for the Heritage Foundation's
Townhall.com.
Today
he enjoys the privilege of expressing himself both
as a teacher and a writer. In his spare time, he
loves spending time with his wife, Krysten. He is
also an avid hunter and reader of classic
literature.
Visit his website at http://www.DrAdams.org.
E-mail: adams_mike@hotmail.com
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|