|
June
3, 2008
So -- Are
Deuces Wild Or Aren't They?
by Gerald A. Honigman
Hey,
I need to get my mind away from international
politics for a while
especially the Middle
East.
How's a game of poker sound?
Deuces wild, you say?
Alright, let the game begin
Nice--I'll bet a hundred bucks on my
hand.
You're seeing me and raising me another
hundred?
We'll, hey
I'm just a Florida teacher,
with three of my four kids in college at the same
time, and the other not far behind. Two 'Gators and
a Seminole so far
Okay... I'll pay to see you.
Full House, Queen high?
Ugh
I have two pair, King high.
Hey, Wait a minute!
Where's the Full House, Chum?
I just see two Queens, two sixes, and a two
of hearts
What...You say deuces are wild?
Since when? Who says?
What
I agreed to that?
Well, that was before you drew the
deuce
Forget about all the legal gobbledygook that
went on until recently regarding the Florida and
Michigan primaries. It all comes down to a poker
game.
Were deuces wild or weren't they?
Well, all parties indeed knew the rules of the
game prior to play time. If there were any
questions, the time to have debated them was prior
to the primaries.
Sour grapes doesn't cut it afterwards. And if
they do, then we're all in for trouble down the
road.
I get a charge out of alleged liberals crying
about disenfranchisement in the aftermath.
Where were their worries when the rules were
being expressed loudly and clearly to all parties
prior to the vote? How about the folks who played
by the rules and didn't even show up because of
them...candidates and voters alike?
The time to question or change the way the game
is to be played is prior to its start--not when you
don't like the hand you're dealt afterwards.
The main issue here is not disenfranchisement
(as real as it is), but chaos
and it doesn't
take a lawyer to figure that one out.
If expressed rules and laws set up by legitimate
representatives are allowed to simply be tossed
aside by disgruntled parties after the fact,
then watch out for any and all other types of
agreements arrived at as well.
Even I know that precedent is important
in law.
And the precedent even the compromise decision
recently arrived regarding these two states, which
knowingly and deliberately disobeyed the Rules and
Bylaws Committee of the Democratic National
Committee, stinks like a rotten egg.
Honigman
Archive
Gerald
A. Honigman is a Florida educator who has done
extensive doctoral studies in Middle Eastern
Affairs. He has created and conducted counter-Arab
propaganda programs for college youth, has lectured
on numerous campuses and other platforms, and has
publicly debated many Arab spokesmen. His articles
and op-eds have been published in dozens of
newspapers, magazines, academic journals and
websites all around the world. Visit his website at
http://geraldahonigman.com/.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|