|
November
18, 2008
Air
Power
Zooming
and Booming for the Sheer Hell of
It
by Fred Reed
OK, today I'm going to tell you everything you
need to know about air power. You will never need
to read anything else. These revelations will
provide blinding insight into our current wars.
Here we go. Hold on.
The key: Air power is really good for things
it is really good for, but works lousily for things
it doesn't work well for. (If "lousily" wasn't
a word, it is now.)
The foregoing is genius incarnate, and would
revolutionize military thinking if the Air Force
understood it, which it doesn't. As is usual with
our late-simian species, the fly-guys' motivations
are instinctual and emotional, with reason a
pretext slathered on afterwards and accountability
a no-show.
Now, it is chic among Military Reformers and
other fern-bar Clausewitzes to say wisely that air
power is impotent and useless and accomplishes
nothing. This is not true. In its own kind of war,
it works splendidly. Often it is the only thing
that could. Anyone who thinks that airplanes are
pointless gewgaws should talk, say, to Japanese
survivors of the Coral Sea and Midway, or of
Yamato's death run.
See, what airplanes are good at is blowing up
expensive, visible, identifiable things, to include
other airplanes. An aircraft carrier in the open
Pacific fits the bill nicely. You can't hide
aircraft carriers very well. They don't look like
anything else. Even a Marine pilot would never
mistake one for an olive orchard, or the cathedral
at Chartres, or the Gobi Desert. They just don't
look the same. With enough bombing runs, an
airplane can hit a carrier, which reduces the
number of enemies instead of increasing it.
What air power isn't good at is fighting
guerrillas and insurgents, especially in populated
areas. Why? Lots of reasons. First, pilots have no
idea what they are bombing. They are flying at
three hundred miles an hour over countries, often
obscured by trees, in which everybody looks exactly
like everybody else. So they guess, or bomb where
the intelligence children tell them are terrorists.
(That was almost a sentence.)
Now, the word "intelligence" sounds much better
than "bureaucratized clandestine confusion," which
is more accurate. The intelligence agencies have
enshrouded themselves in an aura of inexorable
usually fatal infallibility. ("My name is
Bond
Fred Bond.") This is good PR. It is
little else.
These are the same intelligence agencies,
remember, that didn't know where the Japanese fleet
was in 1941 despite rumblings of war, agencies that
were taken by surprise by the North Korean attack
in 1950, and then by the Chinese entry into that
war, that didn't anticipate the behavior of the
Vietnamese in that war, despite Bernard Fall's
books and the highly documented experience of the
French. When the military made a well-executed raid
into Hanoi to free American prisoners at Son Tay,
the intel people hadn't noticed that the prisoners
had been moved. They were surprised when the Berlin
Wall went up, and when it came down. They failed to
foresee the collapse of the Soviet Union. (Their
reason for existence was to know about the Soviet
Union.) They missed on 9/11. Earlier, when the Air
Force bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, it
was because the spooks didn't know where the
embassy was that day. (Granted, embassies are hard
to locate. They roll about on wheels, creep down
alleys at night, and wear dark-colored clothing,
that sort of thing.) The intel weenies also didn't
foresee the behavior of either Iraqis or Afghans,
despite great archives of historical evidence
(unless you think the US knew about these upcoming
messes and invaded anyway). And so on.
These are the geniuses picking targets. You see
the problem.
Now, we read a lot of PR about "surgical
strikes" and "precision weapons." Think carefully
about this. Intel says a terrorist leader of
indescribable potency is in a house in a flimsily
constructed suburb. The Air Force then makes a
surgical strike with a five-hundred-pound bomb,
taking out half a block. Pretty surgical, that.
Perhaps it was the right block -- it is possible --
but still kills seventy-five people. The male
relatives of the dead then join the insurgency.
Ray-rah air power. The Air Force can't afford to
understand this, as then it would have to find a
day job.
So why does the Air Force engage in
counterproductive tactics with totally
inappropriate airplanes? Because it's the only kind
of airplanes it has. Why? Because fast, screaming,
roaring, flashy zoom-buggies with lots of screens
and switches and rockets are fun. Never,
ever underestimate fun as a driver of military
policy. A hot fighter is the world's pizzazziest,
priciest, swooshiest video game, an air-borne dirt
bike with all the fixin's. Really. You may think
I'm trying to be snotty and clever. Think again.
(All right, I'm trying to be snotty and clever, but
what I'm saying is still true.)
Do you think I spent thirty years covering the
military because I wanted to butcher puzzled
third-world illiterates tending goats? No. It was
fun. Low-level pop-and-drops in an F-16 out of Shaw
AFB, F-15 air-to-air against Guard A-7s over
Holloman, bomb runs at four hundred feet over hazy
Wyoming badlands like the doorway to hell in a B-52
-- god, what a freaking trip, far better than
growing up. Snazzy mask and helmet, five-g turns
with your face flowing back behind your ears, world
going inverted, burners kicking in
Hoo-ah!
It's not called a joy stick for nothing.
And jet jocks get paid to do this. Whether it
serves a practical purpose doesn't matter. Not with
rides like those. If you think these things don't
matter, you are out of your mind.
However, the glory days are coming to a close.
Fighter guys are now in the position of cavalry in
1914, addicted to the Noble Horse but, in an age of
machine guns, wire entanglements, and massed
artillery, as viable as slide rules in Santa Clara.
The reason is the armed drone, the Predator being a
good example. These things now have the range,
optronics, data links, and so on to carry serious
missiles to hit the wrong targets and piss off
entire populations as well as real horses --
fighter planes, I meant to say -- can. They are
lots cheaper than piloted whiz-gizmos, and a
bloodless unaccountable CIA geek in Colorado or
wherever can fly them. Same stupid effect, but none
of the fun. Call it anti-chivalry. Death by nerds
without souls.
In a century we've gone from Baron von
Richthofen to a dinosaur eyeing a thin crust of ice
forming on his swamp and thinking, "This can't be
good."
See? Now you understand air power.
Reed
Archive
Copyright 2008 by Fred Reed and reproduced here by
permission of the author.
About
the Author (by the author):
Fred Reed is a Marine combat veteran, police
reporter, amateur biochemist, former long-haul
hitchhiker, and part-time sociopath living in
Mexico. Fred, a keyboard mercenary with a
disorganized past, has worked on staff for Army
Times, The Washingtonian, Soldier of Fortune,
Federal Computer Week, and The Washington
Times. He has been published in Playboy,
Soldier of Fortune, The Wall Street Journal, The
Washington Post, Harper's, National Review, Signal,
Air&Space, and suchlike. He has worked as a
police writer, technology editor, military
specialist, and authority on mercenary soldiers. He
is by all accounts as looney as a tune.
Visit the "Fred
on Everything" website to read his previous
columns and sign up for his regular e-mail
feature.
|
The essays in A Brass Pole in
Bangkok, are sometimes wildly funny,
sometimes deadly serious, always merciless
in their unmasking of the pretenses and
charlatans of society. Fred, a former
Marine, subscribes to no ideology ("an
ideology is just a systematic way of
misunderstanding the world") but
exuberantly wreaks havoc on practically
everything, and delights in everything
else: the psychotherapy swindle, squalling
feminists, race racketeers, damn fool
wars, red-light districts in Asia, and
tequila fests in Mexico, where he
lives.
A
Brass Pole in Bangkok: A Thing I Aspire To
Be, by Fred Reed
|
|
|
Buy Fred's new reprehensible book,
Nekkid In Austin! Another
collection of Fred's collected outrages,
irresponsible ravings, and curmudgeonry
from "Fred On Everything" and some
innocent magazines that, he says,
foolishly published him. Wildly funny,
sometimes wacky, always provocative essays
on the collapse of America.
Nekkid
in Austin: Drop Your Inner Child Down a
Well, by Fred Reed
|
|
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|