|
There is
not a shred of objective scientific evidence
supporting the idea of repressed memory
syndrome.
Repressed
Memory Syndrome
by Jonathan Dolhenty, Ph.D.
The American "psychological industry" has been
suffering setbacks recently. But don't let your
guard down yet. The fight against that industry's
threat to your freedoms will not be over for a long
time.
A jury in Napa, California, has awarded $500,000
to Gary Ramona in his suit against two "therapists"
who had treated his daughter. The jury found that
the two defendants, psychiatrist Dr. Richard Rose
and family counselor Marche Isabella, had destroyed
the father's life by implanting false memories of
child abuse in his daughter's mind. According to
Ramona, his wife divorced him and he was fired from
his job as a winery executive after his daughter
recalled in therapy that he had raped her as a
child. This is called the Repressed Memory
Syndrome, and is just another one of the relatively
new bricks in the psychological powerhouse.
Negative
Impact
This verdict is sure to have a negative impact,
for a while at least, on some of the services
performed by psychological therapists. Some are
already complaining it will put the psychological
industry back 25 years. The executive director of
the California Association of Marriage and Family
Therapists said the verdict will have a chilling
effect on treatment.
It's one of the first verdicts where a third
party has won damages for treatment of someone
else. Richard Harrington, attorney for Mr. Ramona,
said this was a warning to psychotherapists who
carelessly use the idea of recovered memories. "If
they use nonsensical theories about so-called
repressed memories to destroy peoples' lives," he
went on to say, "they will be held accountable. No
one should have to suffer the hell Gary Ramona has
been through."
It Can Ruin A
Life
This is not the first time the concept of
Repressed Memory Syndrome has ruined a person's
life. And it probably won't be the last. The
concept itself is continuing to come under attack
and a group has been formed called the False Memory
Syndrome Foundation. Its director, Pamela Freyd,
applauded the verdict in the Ramona case and said
her group has received 13,000 calls since March
1992 from families suffering through similar
cases.
According to the head of the American
Psychological Association, Dr. Ronald Fox, the
scientific evidence on the validity of recovered
memories is conflicting. Although one of the
defendants in the Ramona case insisted that
"repressed memories are a reality," it is difficult
to see how one could produce evidence supporting
them since it is basically a subjective
experience.
Terrible Injustice Is
Possible
I am not going to step out on a limb and say
that there is definitely no such thing as a
repressed memory. I will say, however, that I can't
conceive of how such a phenomenon can be verified
objectively. It is possible, I suppose, that a
child could be raped and "repress" the memory of
the act, in some sense of not being able to recall
the attack.
Be that as it may, my main concern is the danger
in using such a subjectively based assertion in a
court of law, without any objective corroboration,
where someone's freedom is at stake. Marche
Isabella, one of the defendants in the above case,
is reported to have said that what the patient
thinks is all that matters. Well, that may well be
the case as far as therapeutic treatment is
concerned, but if those thoughts can be used as the
only basis for charges against someone in a court
of law, then we are indeed in a heap of
trouble.
Objective evidence is what has to count in a
court of law. It is what we use to determine guilt
or innocence. The psychological industry must not
be permitted to substitute anything else,
particularly something as subjective as so-called
repressed memories.
More on psychiatry and psychology by Dr.
Dolhenty:
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy Book...
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Magazine...
Academy
Showcase
Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|