|
Good
Books vs Great Books
by Mortimer Adler, Ph.D.
This controversy focuses on the books that
should be a part of one's general education. It is
a dispute about the traditionally recognized canon
of the monuments of Western literature in all
fields--works of mathematics and science as well as
works of poetry, drama, and fiction, and also works
of biography, history, philosophy, and theology.
Here we are confronted with current attacks upon
the canonical list of great books and the responses
that those attacks have elicited.
I am involved in this controversy--as associate
editor of the first edition of the Great Books of
the Western World, published in 1952, and as editor
in chief of the second, much expanded edition,
published in 1990. The second edition differed from
the first in many respects: new translations, a
revised Syntopicon, and six volumes of
twentieth-century authors that did not appear in
the first edition, as well as fifteen authors added
in the period from Homer to Freud. As in the case
of the first edition, so in the case of the second,
our Editorial Board and the large group of advisers
whom we consulted did not agree unanimously about
the authors to be included; but in both cases there
was ninety percent agreement. That, in my judgment,
is all one can expect in a matter of this kind.
I would like to call your attention to two
things about the second edition. In writing an
introductory essay, which appeared in a volume that
accompanied the set, entitled The Great
Conversation, I anticipated the controversy that
the second edition of the Great Books of the
Western World would arouse. This did not arise
before. In the 1940s, when we were engaged in
producing the first edition, ''Eurocentric" was not
current as a disapprobative term. There was no hue
and cry about the absence of female authors; nor
had blacks cried out for representation in the
canon. In those earlier decades of this century,
students and teachers in our colleges and educators
in general were not concerned with multiculturalism
in our educational offerings.
The second edition contains female authors, some
in the nineteenth and some in the twentieth
century, but no black authors; and it is still
exclusively Western (i.e., European or American
authors) with none from the four or five cultural
traditions of the Far East.
The controversy over the desirability of
multiculturalism having arisen in the late 1980s, I
took account of it in my introductory essay,
pointing out carefully the criteria in terms of
which the authors were selected for inclusion,
explaining the difference between the five hundred
or so great works included in the set and the
thousands of good books listed in the Recommended
Readings at the end of each of the 102 chapters in
The Syntopicon. These lists included many female
and many black authors, but none still from the Far
East.
These exclusions were not, and are not,
invidious. The difference between great and good
books is one of kind, not of degree. Good books are
not "almost great" or "less than great" books.
Great books are relevant to human problems in every
century, not just germane to current
twentieth-century problems. A great book requires
to be read over and over, and has many meanings; a
good book needs to have no more than one meaning,
and it need be read no more than once.
I also explained but did not apologize for the
so-called Eurocentrism of the Great Books of the
Western World by pointing out why no authors or
works from the four or five distinct cultural
traditions in the Far East were included or should
be included. The Western authors are engaged in a
great conversation across the centuries about great
ideas and issues. In the multicultural traditions
of the Far East, there are, perhaps, as many as
four or five great conversations about different
sets of ideas, but the authors and books in these
different cultural traditions do not combine these
ideas in one Far Eastern tradition, nor do they
participate in the great conversation that has
occurred over the last twenty-five centuries in the
West. There are undoubtedly great, as distinguished
from good, books in all of these Far Eastern
traditions.
I did not anticipate that those who responded to
the publication of the second edition by
challenging its Eurocentrism or complaining about
the fact that its authors were still for the most
part dead white males, with few females and no
blacks, would do so entirely in terms of
announcements in the press of the list of included
authors, and without reading my introductory essay
and without knowing that a large number of female
and black authors were included in the 102 lists in
The Syntopicon of good books cited as readings
recommended in addition to the great books included
in the set, along with many other books by white
males, none of them regarded as great.
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy Book...
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Magazine...
Academy
Showcase
Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|