|
THE
PERIOD OF SCHOLASTIC PHILOSOPHY -
1
I.
INTRODUCTION
The period of Christian thought extending from
the beginning of the ninth century to the end of
the fifteenth has come to be known as
Scholasticism, a name taken from the school of
philosophy of the University of Paris.
Background
Patristic philosophy reached its climax in the
system of Augustine; it was the last great product
of classical-Christian civilization. When the Roman
empire fell, the only institution that was capable
of standing for law and order was the Church. The
Goths sacked Rome but respected the Church and
offered it protection. The literature and culture
of Greece and Rome became almost extinct; the
barbarous tribes initiated the Dark Ages. The only
philosophy that survived was that which filtered
through the writings of the Church Fathers. From
Augustine to the ninth century learning consisted
of an ecclesiastical dogmatism which was
spiritually lifeless and it did little better than
preserve the traditions of past; Plato and
Aristotle were only partially known.
Scholastic philosophy means an organized system
of truths which are distinct from the dogmas of
faith but not opposed to them. This separation and
coordination of reason and faith is not found in
all Scholastic philosophy, but only during the
period of its greatest splendor achieved under
Thomas Aquinas. Scholastic philosophy, then, may be
divided into:
- The formative period, extending from the
beginning of the ninth century to the middle of
the thirteenth;
- The period of maturity, extending a little
more than half a century and covering Thomas
Aquinas and John Duns Scotus;
- The period of decadence, extending from the
death of Scotus to the end of the fifteenth
century.
The Carolingian Revival of Learning
During the period of decadence, following the
fall of the Roman empire, culture was restricted to
ecclesiastical schools. There were of three
types:
- Monastic schools, whose purpose was the
formation of monks;
- Episcopal schools, whose purpose was the
formation of priests, and occasionally of
laymen;
- Parish schools, which were for the
instruction of the faithful in respect to the
reception of the sacraments.
It is to Charlemagne's credit to have undertaken
the program for the establishment of schools. He
summoned the monk Alcuin and entrusted him with the
work of organizing the schools. Alcuin reformed the
program of studies by establishing the divisions
known as the trivium (comprising grammar, rhetoric
and dialectic) and the quadrivium (arithmetic,
geometry, astronomy and music). He established the
"scola palatina." Other schools following the
program of Alcuin were opened at Tours, Laon,
Orleans and Fulda. This cultural movement had no
development of any importance after the death of
Charlemagne.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On the
Internet
Flaccus
Albinus Alcuin
(c.735-804)
Well-known as a teacher, poet, and monastic,
Alcuin (picture)
achieved his his greatest fame as the educator of
Charlemagne. The emperor probably met him on his
journeys through Italy. Alcuin had returned to
Parma from England because of a declining interest
in education there, and when Charlemagne invited
him to take charge of his court school, the Schola
Palatina, he gladly accepted. There, and later at
Tours, where he had been given the monastery of St.
Martin, Alcuin lived the life of a teacher, always
abreast of the literary developments of the period.
According to him, he "dispensed the honey of the
Holy Scripture, intoxicated his students with the
wine of ancient learning, fed them the apples of
grammatical refinement, and adorned them with the
knowledge of astronomy."
The erudition of Charlemagne is directly
traceable to the influence of his versatile
teacher. Alcuin was a lover of poetry, and wrote
quite acceptable hexameters. But posterity
remembers him best as a great letter writer; more
than three hundred of his letters have been
preserved. Each was written to a distinguished
friend, addressed either by some name which
characterized the recipient, or a Latin paraphrase
of the real name. They are still interesting for
their philosophical content as well as for their
references to historic events.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
II.
THE FORMATIVE PERIOD OF
SCHOLASTICISM
The formative period of Scholasticism (the
ninth, tenth, eleventh, twelfth centuries and the
first half of the thirteenth century) developed
under the influence of St. Augustine's thought.
During this period, because of the prejudice of
illumination,
it was impossible to have a complete separation of
reason from faith. Both mystics and dialecticians
consider the intellect as unable to reason without
being enlightened by God. With the help of
illumination the intellect will be able to
penetrate the content of the mysteries of faith.
This period can be divided as follows:
- The ninth and the tenth century (John Scotus
Erigena and the problem of universals);
- The eleventh and twelfth century (mystics
and dialecticians);
- The first half of the thirteenth century
(the question concerning the works of
Aristotle).
a. The Ninth and Tenth Centuries
1.
John Scotus
Erigena (815? -
877)
Scotus Erigena (picture)
wrote "De Divisione Naturae," a Neo-Platonic work.
According to Erigena, Unity (God) descends into
multiplicity, and multiplicity returns to Unity.
The degrees of reality are the following: (1)
creating, non-created Nature -- God, the Father;
(2) created and creating Nature -- the Son; (3)
created and non-creating Nature -- the sensible
world informed by the Holy Spirit; (4) non-created
and non-creating Nature -- God Himself as final
cause. The first and fourth degrees coincide with
God.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
2.
The Problem of the Universals
What is the value of concepts, which are
universal, in relation to real things, which are
particular? Four solutions were attempted:
- Transcendent realism (the Platonic
solution);
- Immanent realism ( the Aristotelian
solution);
- Conceptualism (the concepts are mental signs
without basis in reality);
- Nominalism (the concepts are names,
speech).
Click HERE
for more details about the problem of
universals.
See also Dr. Jonathan Dolhenty's essay on
The World of
Universals.
3.
Roscelin (c.
1050-1120)
The war waged by Roscelin against Platonism
and every kind of realism is interesting because it
induced him to adumbrate a criticism of language
which impresses one as most modern. Proceeding from
the statement that in nature only individuals exist
and species are not things, Roscelin has inquired
into the generalizing character of words and
language. In 1092 he was accused of adhering to
Tritheism, i.e., that he conceived of the Trinity
as of three distinct deities. He denied such a
doctrine but later returned to it. Roscelin taught
at the schools of several French towns. Among his
pupils was Abelard who later criticized him.
Roscelin's thoughts are known to us only by
quotations which his adversaries made. Of all his
writings only a letter to Abelard is extant.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
b. The Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries
At the beginning of the eleventh century the
Churchmen showed a renewed interest in a better
understanding of the truths of religion. The
thinkers of that time are divided into mystics and
dialecticians. Both feel the influence of
illumination, and hence consider knowledge a gift
of God. Faith is thus presupposed and is considered
superior to reason. Nevertheless thinkers disagree
in determining what is the contribution that reason
can make to faith. The mystics see in philosophy a
remnant of paganism and the danger of heresy. St.
Peter Damian, St. Bernard of Clairvaux and the
Victorines are mystics. The dialecticians, on the
contrary, think that once the understanding of
religious truths is required reason can be invoked
to penetrate the very content of the mysteries of
the faith. St. Anselm and Peter Abelard are
dialecticians.
St.
Anselm (1033 -
1109)
A prominent figure in the struggle for power (in
this period) between the secularists and
ecclesiastics, Anselm (picture)
was of even greater importance as a Christian
philosopher. Although he was not a Scholastic, this
school of church philosophy embodied many of his
concepts.
Anselm, first as abbot and later as archbishop,
defended the authority of the Pope to William Rufus
and Henry I, kings of England. This resulted in his
exile. But regardless of whether he was living in
poverty or splendor, he always maintained an
ascetic existence. His monastic life of
contemplation and meditation was frequently
interrupted by political activity.
His philosophy, largely a justification of
Church practices and dogma, was publicized because
he felt its position needed strengthening. He was
convinced that the comprehension of divine truth
was the result of faith, not reason. He stated that
believing is a necessary condition of knowledge,
and that in order to believe, one need not
probe.
In his most famous book, Cur Deus Homo
(Why God Made Man), he tried to answer questions
concerning the doctrine of man's redemption. He
stated that man is created for an immortal life but
is frustrated by sin, and that the Messiah has the
power of redemption because His virginal birth
excludes Him from the inheritance of sin. His
theory of atonement and satisfaction has determined
Christian thought and piety throughout the
centuries.
St. Anselm
is well known for this ontological argument for the
existence of God:
- The concept which everyone has of God is
that of a most perfect being;
- Greater being cannot be
conceived;
- Consequently, God must also really exist;
otherwise He would no longer be that most
perfect being, for He would lack real
existence.
This thesis, elaborated in his
Proslogium, was accepted by theologians and
such eminent philosophers as Descartes and Leibniz.
This argument, however, marks an illicit passage
from the concept to reality. But, granted the
doctrine of illumination,
it would be valid.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
Peter
Abelard (1079 -
1142)
Abelard's life is a portrait of the triumphs and
vicissitudes of philosophy, faith, and love. He was
born in a little town in Brittany, and having been
ordained as priest, returned there to tutor
Heloise, the niece of Canon Fulbert. His secret
love affair with her, and Astrolabius, the son she
bore him, caused him considerable misfortune, for
when the canon discovered the secret relationship
he had the priest physically mutilated. Abelard
persuaded Heloise to take the veil: he himself
retired to a quiet place near Troyes.
His disciples, however, sought him out, and once
again the handsome, eloquent schoolman attracted
students from all over Europe. He established an
oratory called the Paraclete. His subtle
argumentation persuaded his listeners to found
their beliefs on reason. He tabulated the
contradictions of the Bible and the Church Fathers
for easy reference; he made freedom of the will the
basis of all ethics; he opposed the teachings of
the famous schoolmen, and expounded those concepts
which hold that the Aristotelian precepts, called
universals in scholastic philosophy (such as genus
and species), have only intellectual
significance.
The story of his "calamities" (he wrote a book
by that title) was never-ending. His interpretation
of the Trinity was twice condemned as heretical.
Finally, weary of the fight, he burned his book on
the Trinity and lived out his life, a subdued
follower of the faith. Upon his death Heloise,
twenty-one years younger than he, claimed his body
and buried him. The ashes of both lovers now rest
at the Pere-Lachaise in Paris.
Abelard is the most complex personality of this
time. He attempted to penetrate the mysteries of
faith through reason, and found in St. Bernard his
strongest opponent. In the question of universals,
Abelard is considered a nominalist; but he possibly
may not be such, as his vocabulary is not
absolutely clear.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On the
Internet
St.
Bernard of
Clairvaux
(1091-1153)
"The visionary of the century" was the way St.
Bernard (picture)
characterized himself, for he felt that he had been
selected by God to guide Christianity along the
right paths. He sincerely tried to lead the life of
a saint, although he was cognizant of those
temptations that led men astray. An objective
observer, John of Salisbury, noticed that he often
lost his temper and behaved unjustly, and Bishop
Otto of Freising, a pious church member, accused
him of jealousy and habitual weaknesses.
Bernard asserted that his inner life was based
on the stages of the ascent of his soul toward God,
and upon supernatural grace. His book De Gadibus
Humilitatis et Superbiae (published c. 1121)
established him as the founder of Christian
mysticism of the Middle Ages. Here, he condemned
the acquisition of knowledge for merely the sake of
knowledge. To him, knowledge is only justified when
it promotes the purification of the soul and leads
it toward union with God. Humility is the basic
condition for this union, and it, in turn,
engenders love. He stated that there are twelve
degrees of humility -- the highest constitutes the
cognition of truth, and this is identical with
union with God. This stage is psychologically
characterized as the extinction of all sensitive
life, but it does not remove the essential
difference between man, a finite being, and God.
With this reservation, Bernard's philosophy
separates him from the monism of later mystics.
Bernard excelled as an ecclesiastical ruler, as
the organizer of a monastic order, as an
irresistibly persuasive orator and an experienced
administrator. As abbot of the monastery at
Clairvaux, he was incapable of imposing his will on
popes, kings, and emperors, but his ascendency over
the masses was unfailing. However, shortly before
his death, the terrible disasters of the Second
Crusade took place. Because he had agitated for
this crusade with all his power, its failure
aroused doubt and opposition. His abhorrence of
knowledge for the sake of knowledge made him a grim
adversary of Abailard and Gilbert de la
Portée. He succeeded in persecuting the
former, but was defeated in his controversy with
the latter. Bernard wrote many sermons, epistles,
and hymns.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
Peter
Lombard (c.
1100-1160)
For more than two centuries, Peter Lombard's
(picture)
Four Books of Sentences had been used as the
chief textbook by students of theology. Born in the
town of Lumello in Lombardy, Peter became a
professor of theology at the Cathedral School of
Notre Dame, Paris, and in 1159, he was Bishop of
Paris. He was associated with St. Bernard and the
teacher of Abelard, his later adversary.
He though little of logic and epistemology.
According to him, human knowledge is bound to
remain fragmentary, but true knowledge is higher
than faith which, on its part is higher than
opinion. The tenets of metaphysics are to be
verified by the study of the Holy Scriptures and
thereupon defended by "Catholic reason." In order
to offer his pupils a reliable basis for
disputations, he compiled his collection of
Sentences from the Fathers and early teachers of
the Church.
In The Radical
Academy
Essay: Trinity,
by Peter Lombard
Elsewhere On The
Internet
c. The First Half of the Thirteenth
Century
1. The Establishing of
Universities: As a consequence of the
interest in studies, some ecclesiastical schools
were reinvigorated and rose to great fame. This is
the origin of many universities; the most
celebrated of them is the University of Paris, then
Oxford University. While the universities were
being organized, two religious Orders -- namely,
the Franciscans and Dominicans -- obtained the
faculty to teach in them, and made a large
contribution to the development of Scholastic
philosophy.
2. The Discovery of the
Works of Aristotle: The major factor in
the development of Scholastic was the discovery of
the works of Aristotle, which happened during the
first half of the thirteenth century. These works
first reached the universities through the
commentaries of Jewish and Arabian
philosophers.
Among the famous commentators on Aristotle in
Spain were two Jewish philosophers, Avicebron (died
about 1058), and Maimonides (died 1204) (picture).
The Arabian physician Avicenna (picture)
enjoyed greater fame. He attempted to reconciled
Aristotle with the religion of Islam, and hence
affirmed the immortality of the soul.
The most famous commentator was the
Spanish-Arabian philosopher Averroes (1126-1198)
(picture). He too was a
physician and Thomas Aquinas gave him the
designation "The Commentator."
Later what was called the "translatio nova" of
Aristotle, made directly from the Greek, was
attempted. The attitude of thinkers in regard to
the works of Aristotle was threefold:
- Some thinkers advocated the integral
acceptance of the system of Aristotle -- the
most representative of this group was Siger of
Brabant;
- Others accepted Aristotle's opinions when
these were not opposed to St. Augustine -- the
most representative of this group is St.
Bonaventure;
- Yet others -- among them, Thomas Aquinas,
who accepted the system of Aristotle critically
-- discarded the theories of the philosopher in
those points which were not in accord with
Christianity.
Siger of Brabant (died about 1281) in his work
"De Anima Intellectiva" holds the theory that the
world is eternal, denies providence, and admits the
existence of the acting intellect as something
separate and the same for all men. Siger defended
himself by having recourse to the principle of
the double truth.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On the
Internet
To Page
Two
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Book...
|