|
THE
PERIOD OF PATRISTIC PHILOSOPHY
General
Observations
In common with much early philosophy,
Christianity holds to theism, or the absolute
transcendence of God. Hence it would have been
possible, absolutely speaking, to work out a
Christian philosophy from the very first appearance
of Christianity. Such a philosophy, taking into
account the dogmatic affirmations of religion,
would have explained the philosophical problems
which follow from the absolute transcendence of
God. But this did not happen in the centuries
immediately following the appearance of
Christianity, and one must wait for the rise of
Scholasticism in order to have a Christian
philosophy. The Christians of the ages immediately
following the birth of Christianity were occupied
with the defense of their religion against the
accusations of paganism and with establishing its
dogmas in exact formulas rather than in fashioning
a system of philosophy which would be in accord
with those dogmas. Preoccupation with revealed
truths prevailed over the data of rationalization.
This period, given strictly to the vindication and
determination of revealed truths, is called the
Patristic Age, and extends from the second through
the eighth century, that is, until the dawn of
Scholasticism.
Patristic thought has very great value with
reference to theology. Certain writers of this age
are called the Fathers of the Church because they
are sure guides in the interpretation of the truths
of Christian belief. But their contribution to the
history of thought is of little interest. The
Fathers were also philosophers, but with the
exception of St. Augustine not one of them was very
much preoccupied with philosophy. They considered
it only incidentally, when the problem of religion
offered occasion to enter into a philosophical
discussion.
A second general observation on Patristic
thought is that regarding the difference in
attitude of the Greek and Latin Fathers toward
philosophy. The Greek Fathers as well as those of
Alexandria and the rest of proconsular Africa, were
more inclined by tradition to speculation;
consequently they considered philosophy an ally of
theology, and when the occasion presented itself,
they willingly appealed to philosophy. On the other
hand, Rome never had a real philosophical
tradition; she was the creator of law, not of
philosophy. The Latin Fathers -- and with them are
included the Fathers of Latin Africa, chiefly at
Carthage -- had a predilection for practical moral
problems based on the law. Their attitude toward
philosophy was not only one of negligence, but at
times one that is even hostile, since they saw in
philosophy the danger of rationalizing religion and
hence of taking from it its revealed content.
Patristic thought reached its culmination in the
Council of Nicea (325), but the greatest -- indeed,
the only exponent of Patristic philosophy -- is St.
Augustine. Keeping this in mind, philosophy divides
Patristic thought into three periods: (1)
Pre-Augustinian; (2) Augustinian; (3)
Post-Augustinian.
I.
THE PRE-AUGUSTINIAN PERIOD
The Pre-Augustinian Period includes the second
and third centuries of the Christian era and the
first half of the fourth century. During the second
century the Fathers of the Church were largely
engaged in defending Christianity from the
accusations hurled against it by pagans and Jews.
Their writings are in the form of apologies or
defensive tracts in which they directly intend to
show that these accusations are unreasonable;
indirectly they also try to acquire new converts to
Christianity. Moreover, the second century saw the
rise of a dangerous heresy, Gnosticism. The Fathers
of this century are classified as apologists and
controversialists.
1.
The Apologists
The apologists of the second century were for
the most part Greeks. Aristides of Athens directed
an apology to the Emperor Antoninus Pius (138-161)
to prove that only the Christians possess the true
idea of God. Athenagoras, a Christian philosopher
of Athens, in an apology which seems to be directed
to the Emperors Hadrian and Antoninus Pius, defends
the Christians against the calumnious reports of
their being atheists and partaking in bloody
banquets. He goes further and points our the purity
of Christian morality. Minucius Felix wrote
Octavius, a dispute between a pagan and a
Christian, and in it he refutes the usual calumnies
against the Christians and administers a sound
beating to polytheism.
The most important Greek apologist of the second
century is St. Justin Martyr who, after having
spend his youth in contact with Stoic, Pythagorean,
and Platonic philosophers, was converted to
Christianity about the year 130. After his
conversion he opened a school at Rome, where he
died a martyr's death about the year 165. Two
Apologies and his Dialogue with the Jew
Triphon have come down to us. In his literary
work, Justin attempts a defense of Christianity
through philosophy. For Justine not only is there
no contradiction between Christianity and Greek
philosophy, but Greek philosophy should be laid
down as a basis for Christianity and Plato
considered the disciple of Moses. Everything that
is true and great in Greek philosophy is Christian,
and Christianity is the complement of ancient
thought, according to Justin.
Justin
Martyr (c.
110-165)
The earliest defense of Christianity against
paganism using philosophical arguments was written
by Justin (picture),
who later suffered a martyr's death in Rome.
Justin's Apologies is also of interest
because it describes Christian worship as it was
performed in early times, refutes accusations
against members of the Christian community and
tries to convince pagan philosophers by using their
own terms.
Justin, who was born in the Samaritan town of
Flavia Neapolis, the old Shechem which had been
destroyed by Vespasian in 67 A.D. and which is
called Nablus today, probably was not of Samaritan
but of pagan descent. Evidently he had studied
pagan philosophy before his conversion, and
acquired, if not profound knowledge, a fluency of
style and ability in using philosophical terms.
Justin also had a controversy with a Jewish
scholar on which he reported in his Dialogue
with Tryphon. Tryphon probably was a real
person, known as Tarfon the Tanna, who was opposed
to Christianity but who died before Justin was
grown up.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
2.
The Controversialists
The controversialists are distinguished from the
apologists in this, that their writings are aimed
at refuting the various heresies which appeared in
the second century. Among these heresies the most
important was Gnosticism, which, although presented
in different forms, is always the same in this,
that it attempts to empty religion of its
supernatural content and to reduce dogmas to
physical events. Gnosticism may be presented in
outline form as follows: an abstract concept of the
divinity which transcends the world of phenomena is
its first point. There is a separation between God
and the author of the world; Demiurge is the
architect of the world. Opposition exists between
spirit and matter; matter is evil, darkness.
Between the world and the divinity there exists a
series of intermediate "eons"; Christ is one such
eon who appeared to liberate those souls that had
been imprisoned in matter by Demiurge. Christ did
not have a real body, nor did He really die; His
body was only apparent. hence there are no such
things as grace or the sacraments. Purification
from evil is obtained through a special knowledge
of God and of good; this knowledge is
gnosis.
The Pastor (or Shepherd) of Hermas
was written against such heresies. In this work the
unknown author points out the new doctrines as
teachings published by men who have lost their
common sense. He insists on fidelity to the truths
"that God is one, that He has created and disposed
all things, has called forth all things from
nothingness into existence, and contains all
things."
The third century is important on account of the
development which began to appear in the Christian
school of Alexandria, the Didascalion, and also for
the written apologies of certain Church Fathers of
western Africa.
3.
The Didascalion of Alexandria
In the beginning, the Didascalion of Alexandria
was a school preparing for baptism those who were
being converted to the new faith. Toward the latter
half of the second century, however, and the first
half of the third century, Alexandria became the
seat of a lofty philosophical culture. During this
period, Ammonius Saccas taught at Alexandria and
Plotinus formulated the last great system of Greek
philosophy. The atmosphere of speculative culture
in Alexandria brought about the transformation of
the primitive catechumenical school into an
institute of high culture dependent on the Bishop.
The continuous polemical attacks which Christianity
had to sustain against the Neo-Platonists resulted
in the formation of learned men who, moving on the
same philosophical plane, would be capable of
refuting the accusations of the adversaries. The
Christians thus prepared were called Gnostics (not
to be confused with the heretics of the same name)
as distinct from the simple Christians who believed
but did not possess the broad culture necessary for
entering safely into arguments with adversaries.
This transformation of the Christian school of
Alexandria came about at the end of the second
century. The first director of the Christian school
was Pantaenus; the greatest masters of the school
after him were Clement and Origen.
Clement
of Alexandria
(c.150-215)
St. Clement of Alexandria (picture)
was born about the year 150 of pagan parents,
probably in Athens. Converted to Christianity,
perhaps through his philosophical investigations,
and desirous of obtaining a more profound knowledge
of the faith, he undertook a series of travels in
search of Christian teachers.
When he reached Alexandria he met Pantaenus, at
that time director of the Didascalion, and,
attracted by his deep learning and sanctity, he
remained close by the master. On the death of
Pantaenus toward the year 200, Clement succeeded
him as director and teacher of the school, and had
Origen (see below) as his pupil. A few years later,
forced by the persecution of Septimius Severus to
close the school, he retired to Cappadocia in Asia
Minor, where he died.
The most important works of Clement are the
Protrepticus (or the Word, prompter of the
Christian Life) in twelve chapters; the
Paedagogus, in three books, the first of
which presents the Word as the teacher of souls,
while the other two treat of the vices which
Christians must avoid; the Stromata, or
"Tapestries," miscellanies on different
teachings.
Clement is chiefly concerned with showing the
connection between philosophy and faith. He
believes that Greek philosophy prepares the mind so
that it may better understand revealed truths. Man,
through the medium of philosophy, transforms his
faith into wisdom, that is, into the Christian
gnosis. Through this latter, them, he attains a
superior understanding of revelation which the
simple faithful do not have. Clement does not place
gnosis in opposition to faith, nor revelation in
opposition to faith. Instead, he holds that science
(or knowledge) contributes to making the Christian
more convinced of the truths of his faith.
Thus there is in Clement the cultivation of
philosophy which in ancient times would have had as
its end the education of pagans. In the Christian
world the purpose of this cultivation was to
develop the gnosis by which a Christian, convinced
of what he believes and does, might be able to live
a good life.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
Origen
(c. 185-253)
Origen (picture),
called the Adamantine, was born in Alexandria about
the year 185 of Christian parents. His father,
Leonides, died a martyr. When Clement as Bishop of
Alexandria, had to leave his see because of the
persecution of Septimius Severus, he entrusted the
direction of the Didascalion to Origen, then a
youth of only eighteen.
Desirous of obtaining a more profound culture,
Origen entered Ammonius Saccas' school in
Alexandria, where he was a fellow student of
Plotinus and learned the Platonic philosophy which
was to predominate in all his activities as master
of the school and as an author.
Wishing to complete his culture and also to meet
persons who were desirous of knowing him, he
undertook long journeys. During this time he was
ordained a priest by the Bishops of Caesarea and
Jerusalem -- this, against the wishes of his own
Bishop. When he returned to Alexandria he was not
only deprived of his chair in the Didascalion, but
was also condemned for certain heterodox opinions
expressed in his book De principiis. He then
left Alexandria and sought refuge with the two
Bishop friends who had ordained him. In Caesarea he
opened a theological school which surpassed that of
Alexandria. He taught in this school for twenty
years amid universal admiration, and died at Tyre
about the year 253.
Origen's literary productivity was
extraordinary. More than a hundred works came from
his pen, but the greater part of these have been
lost. His most important writings are: De
principiis and Contra Celsum. In the
beginning Origen enjoyed very wise fame, but
gradually this declined as his works gave occasion
to greater discussion and the latent errors of
Platonism were revealed in them.
Origen attempts to furnish Christianity with a
solid rational basis, and for this reason he can be
considered as the first systematizer of scientific
theology. In De principiis he tried to give
us a science based on revelation. In fact he begins
his argument with revealed truths, which he makes
the basis of his speculation, and then draws those
conclusions which can be rationally deduced from
them.
Despite his good intentions, this method of
thought only implanted the seeds of those errors
which gave occasion to the so-called question of
"Origenism"; Creation is eternal as a consequence
of the goodness of God, who is eternal, and because
creation in time would imply mutability in God. The
creation of souls is also eternal, and although by
nature all souls are equal, the use and abuse of
liberty separates them into various grades. Evil
cannot be eternal. In regard to the resurrection of
the dead, it is not certain what Origen taught.
Contra Celsum is a defense of religion
written by Origen against Celsus, a pagan
philosopher and the author of Sermo verus in
which attacked Christianity in the Gospel, in the
person of Christ, and of those who believe in Him.
Origen attacks Celsus on the same plane by minutely
discussing the prophecies and miracles of Christ
and by showing a prodigious erudition and a solid
faith tempered in the school of the martyrs. For
Origen, the spread of the Church and of the moral
reform carried on by her are signs of her vitality
and divine origin.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
4.
The Latin Apologists (Latin Africa)
The Fathers of the Western Church, because of a
general tendency to rationalize Christianity, were
preoccupied with the danger of Gnosticism, and
therefore opposed any mingling of religion and
philosophy. Among the Latin apologists, besides
Minucius Felix, who has been mentioned in the
account of the second century, are Arnobius, author
of Adversus gentes, a work which recognizes
only the Christian faith as certain knowledge, and
Lactantius, author of Institutiones divinae.
The most original, though not a philosopher, is
Tertullian of Carthage. Born toward the middle of
the second century, Tertullian gave himself to
literary, philosophical, medical, and especially
juridical studies.
Tertullian
(c. 165-220)
It is believed that Tertullian (picture)
practiced law. Born a pagan, he was converted to
Christianity about the year 190 and was ordained
priest about the year 200. A man of willful,
militant, and rigorist trend of mind, he ultimately
became a member of the Montanist sect. His writings
were numerous, and all of a polemical nature -- the
fitting product of his uncommon dialectical
abilities.
His most outstanding work is the
Apologeticus, in sixty chapters. In defense
of Christianity against the accusations of the
pagans, Tertullian appeals to reason, common sense,
and nature. In his writings against heretics, and
especially the Gnostics, who in the name of
philosophy emptied faith of its revealed content,
he assumes an attitude of hostility toward
philosophy. "The Gospel and the Academy have
nothing in common; truth is given to us by the
former, while the latter loses itself in empty
ratiocinations," wrote Tertullian in his Credo
quia absurdum.
He appeals to the Roman magistrate against the
absolute power of the civil authority; for
instance, he criticizes the answer given to Pliny
by Emperor Trajan when the latter was told that he
should abstain from hunting out Christians, but
should condemn them only if they were denounced to
the tribunal. With convincing logic Tertullian asks
why, if the Christians deserve condemnation,
shouldn't they be sought out? And if they should
not be sought out, then why not let them go free?
"Si damnas, cur non et inquiris? Si non inquiris
cur et non absolvis?"
Tertullian, who was not ignorant of philosophy,
assumes an anti-philosophical and anti-rationalist
attitude because the times in which he lived showed
him how all heresies had arisen in the name of
philosophy. He is the representative of the Latin
thought of the West, which was diffident toward
speculation. He was a lover of the law which, he
believed, should be the same for all citizens.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
5.
The Great Controversies of the First Half of the
Fourth Century
During the first half of the fourth century
there arose great controversies on the Trinity and
the Christological doctrines of the Church. The
Trinitarian problem may be stated as follows: What
relationship exists between the person of Jesus,
the Son of God, and the Father and Holy Spirit? The
Christological problem, briefly stated, is: What is
the relationship between the divinity of Jesus and
the humanity which He assumed during His life on
earth? Both problems gave occasion to many
heresies.
The most noteworthy heterodox teaching regarding
the Trinitarian question was the heresy of Arius, a
priest of Alexandria, who affirmed the likeness of
the Son to the Father, but denied His
consubstantiality with the Father. The great
opponent of Arius was St. Athanasius of Alexandria,
defender of the Catholic formula of
consubstantiality which was approved in the council
of Nicea in 325.
In connection with the Christological question
there arose two kinds of heresies: the first,
called Monophysitism and championed by Eutyches,
held that Jesus had only one nature, the divine, in
which His human nature was absorbed. Eutyches was
condemned by the Council of Chalcedon in 451.
The second heresy was that of Nestorius, which
was condemned in the Council of Ephesus in 431.
Nestorius, a priest of Antioch, separated the
divine and human natures in Jesus, thus forming two
persons. Mary, the Mother of Jesus, must be called
the Mother of Christ, not the Mother of God.
The Catholic formula, that in Christ there are
two distinct natures, the human and the divine, in
the unity of the Divine Person, was determined by
the letter of Pope Leo the Great and upheld in the
Council of Ephesus by St. Cyril, Bishop of
Alexandria.
During this period there arose in defense of
Catholic truths a numerous host of Church Fathers
whose authority in theology is very great. Besides
those already mentioned there are: St. Gregory of
Nazianzus, St. Gregory of Nyssa, St. Basil, St.
John Chrysostom, St. Ambrose, St. Eusebius, St.
Hilarius. The greatest contribution was made by the
Greek Fathers, as has already been observed, and
for this reason they may be called the founders of
theology.
Go to page
two of the Patristic Period
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Book...
|