|
Reasons
and Writing
by Jean Paul Sartre
Each one has his reasons; for one, art is a
flight; for another, a means of conquering. But one
can flee into a hermitage, into madness, into
death. One can conquer by arms. Why does it have to
be writing, why does one have to manage his
escapes and conquests by writing? Because,
behind the various aims of authors, there is a
deeper and more immediate choice which is common to
all of us. We shall try to elucidate this choice,
and we shall see whether it is not in the name of
this very choice of writing that the engagement of
writers must be required.
Each of our perceptions is accompanied by the
consciousness that human reality is a "revealer,"
that is, it is through human reality that "there
is" being, or, to put it differently, that man is
the means by which things are manifested. It is our
presence in the world which multiplies relations.
It is we who set up a relationship between this
tree and that bit of sky. Thanks to us, that star
which has been dead for millennia, that quarter
moon, and that dark river are disclosed in the
unity of landscape. It is the speed of our auto and
our airplane which organizes the great masses of
the earth. With each of our acts, the world reveals
to us a new face. But, if we know that we are
directors of being, we also know that we are not
its producers. If we turn away from this landscape,
it will sink back into its dark permanence. At
least, it will sink back; there is no one made
enough to think that it is going to be annihilated.
It is we who shall be annihilated, and the earth
will remain in its lethargy until another
consciousness comes along to awaken it. Thus, in
our inner certainty of being "revealers" is added
that of being inessential in relation to the thing
revealed.
One of the chief motives of artistic creation is
certainly the need of feeling that we are essential
in relationship to the world. If I fix on canvas or
in writing a certain aspect of the fields or the
sea or a look on someone's face which I have
disclosed, I am conscious of having produced them
by condensing relationship, by introducing order
where there was none, by imposing the unity of mind
on the diversity of things. That is, I feel myself
essential in relation to my creation. But this time
it is the created object which escapes me; I can
not reveal and produce at the same time. The
creation becomes inessential in relation to the
creative activity. First of all, even if it appears
to others as definitive, the created object always
seems to us in a state of suspension; we can always
change this line, that shade, that word. Thus, it
never forces itself. A novice painter asked
his teacher, "When should I consider my painting
finished?" And the teacher answered, "When you can
look at it in amazement and say to yourself
'I'm the one who did that!'"
Excerpted from What is
Literature?, by Jean Paul Sartre
|
What
Is Literature, by Jean-Paul Sartre
|