|
The
Ethical Period
Introduction
The Ethical Period extends from the death of
Aristotle to the beginning of the era of the decay
and dissolution of Greek philosophy -- that is, for
a duration of about three centuries.
In the history of culture and civilization it
takes the name of Hellenism, signifying the
diffusion of Greek culture in the world, which up
to this time is regarded as barbarian. While at
first Greece and, more distinctly, Athens was the
center of studies, now new centers arise: Rhodes,
Pergamus, Antioch and Alexandria. These, though
having their own particular inclinations, compete
in culture with Athens and among themselves.
The aims and development of Alexandria, the most
important of these centers, are explained in a
special note after the exposition of the
philosophic thought of this age.
In the history of philosophy this period is
called Ethical. Indeed, during this time
metaphysics falls into decadence or disappears
completely, to give place to a practical problem;
i.e., what direction or aim must man give his
activity in order to assure himself peace of soul,
in which, it is believed, happiness consists?
This displacement of metaphysics by ethics, of
pure speculation by practical thought, was the
unavoidable consequence of the sadness of the
times. Greece loses its independence, which was
never again to be regained in the ancient world.
First, the successors of Alexander the Great, and
then the Romans, were to become masters of this
piece of earth. Furthermore, this period is
characterized by endless wars between the
successors of Alexander and the Roman empire, which
bathed in blood not only Greece but all the
countries of the Mediterranean basin as well.
These factors produced a spiritual bewilderment,
and first of all a weakening of religious faith.
The gods, under whose protection the Greeks had
placed their cities, now appeared incapable of
defending their rights over these same cities and
the people entrusted to them. In addition to this,
the ancient laws, which represented the fruit of
ancient wisdom and which for the Greeks were the
practical model of the life of the sage, crumbled
like the walls of the cities under the violence of
armies. Right fell away before might, and
devastation and slaughter rendered ever more vivid
the predominance of evil over good.
As happens in great universal catastrophes, man,
no longer able to have confidence in things outside
himself, reenters into himself, and asks of himself
the strength to oppose the evils which hang over
him; so it happens at this time we are examining.
Individualism takes the place which the community
of men should hold, and the private good takes
precedence over the common good. Hence one turns,
as in truth was done during this period, not to the
search for pure metaphysics, for lofty speculation,
but to one's own reason, which should be the model
of life for a sage who wishes to live in accordance
with his reason and hence to assure himself,
despite the crumbling world about him and the evils
which surround him, of that quiet of soul necessary
for the wise man. Thus philosophy becomes a
practical problem, an ethical one, a search for an
ideal worthy of a wise man, a philosopher.
If one looks at the problem of life in this way,
there are only three possible means of solving
it:
- 1. to appeal to reason (to the virtues
called dianoetic by Aristotle);
- 2. to appeal to pleasures;
- 3. to deceive oneself in the belief that
every appeal is useless.
These are the characteristics of the three
streams of though which philosophy followed in its
ethical development; i.e., Stoicism (the appeal to
reason); Epicureanism (the appeal to pleasure); and
Skepticism (the renunciation of every
solution).
Both the Stoics and the Epicureans speak of a
logic and a physics which in its basis is
metaphysics. But these two parts are only
justifications of morality. As a consequence, there
is one problem -- that is, the search for a model
of life (ethics) -- which is determined rationally
by its relation to metaphysics.
I.
STOICISM
Zeno
of Citium
(336-264 B.C.)
Zeno of Citium (picture)
was the founder of Stoicism. He came to Athens and
at first was a disciple of the Cynic Crates. Then
he opened his own school on a famous porch in
Athens, from which place (Stoa is Greek for
porch) it got the name "Stoic." He divided his
teaching into logic, physics (which really is
metaphysics) and ethics.
Logic and physics are ways of justifying the
precepts of ethics. The Stoics presented, in
popular form, the theories of life proposed by
Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. These theories
generally opposed materialism, hedonism, and
egoism. Stoicism suited the strong judicial notions
of the Roman mind. Stoicism maintained a lofty
conception of human nature. The Stoics illustrated
their doctrines by using the finest Roman types -
this was a public service and extended Roman
ideals. The Stoic doctrines concerning external
conditions were important in preparing the way for
Christianity - they influenced Christian asceticism
in despising the body. The Stoics laid stress on
the idea of natural law which aided jurists in
framing the legal codes of Rome. Stoicism is
distinguished by three periods:
- (1) the early Stoicism of Zeno;
- (2) Middle Stoicism, with its tendency to
Eclecticism;
- (3) Neo-Stoicism, which was more interested
in religious problems - this form became
widespread in the Roman empire.
Theory of Knowledge
The Stoics held that the soul is a "tabula rasa"
(blank sheet) and that only sensations are true.
Ideas are reduced to images which are merely the
co-ordinated result of many similar sensations
preserved in memory and expressed in speech. The
"criterion" for discerning true sensations from
false sensations is the "assent" of the
intellect.
Physics (Metaphysics)
The universe is conceived of as a great living
organism composed of body and soul, both of
material nature. The soul of the universe is called
"Fire" or "Providence" or "God," and it is immanent
in the universe. Every activity of the universe is
rooted in mechanical necessity; hence there is no
place for freedom.
Ethics
Virtue is the sole good and of itself is
happiness; but what does virtue mean? Virtue means
living according to reason, and reason tells us
that all that happens must happen in order to
actuate a superior good willed by God (who is
immanently conceived). Hence a man is virtuous when
he wishes that which happens and nothing else. But
besides reason, there are in man passions and
emotions. These are irrational elements, vices, and
must therefore be eradicated in order to complete
the domination of reason and to avoid every
surprise. If this complete domination of reason
cannot be retained, the Stoic will have recourse to
suicide; for it is better to flee life than to lose
tranquility of spirit. Stoic morality is one of
absolute renunciation. The Stoic renounces all
temporal goods because their loss can cause
disturbance of mind. Since the Stoic does not
believe in the immortality of the soul nor in the
existence of God, such complete renunciation is
made only for an egotistical motive (in order not
to lose tranquility of spirit. Hence, while
Christian morality is based on humility and
charity, the ethics of the Stoic are based on
egotistical pride. In politics, the Stoics defend
cosmopolitanism against racial sentiment; theirs
was a cosmopolitanism which produced much good in
Roman society.
The Defects of Stoicism
Stoic teaching, in the main, was a direction for
the strong man. It was pitched too high for average
human nature and offered little regard for human
sympathy and human weakness. The Stoic was obsessed
by the pride of his own virtue. The Stoic advocated
following nature without saying what nature is save
that it is an abstract system.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On the
Internet
Cleanthes
(310-232 B.C.)
Noted as a director of the oldest Stoic school
for thirty-one years, Cleanthes, an indigent
scholar, worked mostly as a porter until finally,
at the age of fifty, he was enabled to enter a
philosopher's school. He became a devoted disciple
of Zeno of Citium, the Stoic, studied under his
master for nineteen years, and upon Zeno's death,
assumed the directorship of the school. Cleanthes
slightly modified Zeno's doctrine.
Cleanthes was also famous as a poet; of his
forty works, all of them very short, many fragments
are extant. A large portion of his most famous
poem, Hymn to Zeus, has been preserved. Even as
head of the school, and despite his advanced years,
Cleanthes continually astonished his friends by
hoisting heavy loads and earning his living by
manual work.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
Chrysippus
( c. 280-207 B.C.)
The Stoic school of philosophy, established by
Zeno, would not have had as lasting an influence
had not Chrysippus (picture)
developed and solidified its concepts.
He was born in Soli, Cilicia, Asia Minor, and
went to Athens in 260 B.C. There he succeeded
Cleanthes as director of the Stoic school.
Chrysippus is said to have written some seven
hundred books on a variety of topics. Although his
literary style was far from masterful, he was a
systematic thinker, logician, and psychologist. He
anticipated several important propositions which
were of considerable consequence in later eras. He
particularly investigated sentiments and ideas, and
tried to obtain through logical and dialectical
disquisitions the irrefutable truths upon which his
ethics and theology were based.
Chrysippus stated that the essential
characteristic of man which distinguished him from
the animals was that his judgment became active as
soon as his sensations were irritated. In ethics,
Chrysippus assumed that a natural impetus operated
in all living creatures. This impetus was conscious
in man. He did not see any dichotomy between the
decision of human will and that of natural impetus.
Nature, striving for virtue, made the natural
impetus.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
II.
EPICUREANISM
The founder of the Epicurean School was Epicurus
(342?-270 B.C.) (picture).
In 306 B.C., he opened a school at Athens in his
own garden. Epicurus was a cultivated and
fashionable man, and his school became a center of
aristocratic life for his friends and disciples.
Summaries of his teachings were put into pamphlet
form and given to his pupils to be learned by
heart. His disciples gave him divine honors. The
poem of Lucretius Carus (96?-55 B.C.), "De Natura
Rerum," is the chief source for the Epicurean
doctrine.
Logic
The Epicureans were like the Stoics inasmuch as
they recognized only sense knowledge as valid and
reduced ideas to images of many similar sensations.
They were opposed to the Stoics on the question of
the criterion of truth, affirming that the "canon"
of truth is the subjective evidence produced by
sensation.
Physics (Metaphysics)
Epicurus noted that two impediments hinder man
from a happy life; fear of God and the horror of
death. To overcome these he adopted the atomic
doctrine of Democritus, in which there is neither
fear of God nor horror of death, since everything
is nothing more than an association and
dissociation of atoms.
Ethics
Nature and reason show that pleasure is the only
good and pain the only evil. Animals, guided by
nature, are inclined to seek pleasure and flee
pain. Man must do likewise to attain a state of
tranquility. Epicurus also noted that the root of
all evil is the desire for pleasure. According to
his observation, he classified all goods according
to those which may be desired and those which must
be avoided. These are: (1) natural and necessary
goods; (2) natural and unnessary goods; and (3)
unnatural and unnecessary goods. The Epicurean must
be satisfied only with the goods of the first
class, and he must renounce those of the second and
third class. With the goods of the first class
(food and clothing) the Epicurean obtains
tranquility of body; by renouncing the goods of the
second and third class (family and honors) he
obtains tranquility of spirit. Epicurus did not,
however, renounce friendship and the pleasures of
art, both of which he considered necessary to
remove the discomforts of life.
Religion
In religion, Epicurus admits the existence of
Gods who live a happy life in the void space of the
sky. They do nothing for man, neither good nor
evil. Epicurus pays respect to them for aesthetic
reasons, just as he respects the statues in his
garden.
Summary
The pleasures of the mind are declared to be
superior to those of the body. Epicurean pleasure
is not sensuality, it is the highest Good of every
individual. It is not the pursuit of the coarse and
violent pleasures of sense but the equable,
moderate, and enduring pleasures of the mind and of
friendship. Its philosophy is a doctrine of
self-interest and selfish amiability occasioned
through strivings which seek the goal of happiness
and may lead to disregard of others. Epicureanism
made a strong appeal to the world-weariness of
society but did not appeal to the more robust Roman
of the Republic.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On the
Internet
Lucretius
[Titus Lucretius
Carus]
(98-55 B.C.)
The system of Epicurus was converted into a
striking picture of cosmic and human life by
Lucretius (picture) in
his poem De Rerum Natura (On the Nature of
Things). A tense, electric atmosphere permeates
this poem. Much more than a didactic work, it is
the confession of a man of violent passions who is
longing for equanimity and, while cleansing his own
mind of false ideas, proves to be ready to
sacrifice even those illusions that apparently
promise peace of mind.
The only extant report of Lucretius' life was
written by Jerome, the Father of the Church, who
certainly does not approve of the poet's opinions
and quite possibly is not an impartial biographer.
According to Jerome, Lucretius was afflicted by
intermittent insanity, and committed suicide. Some
sayings of Lucretius himself indicate that he was
threatened by mental disease,and it is probable
that he became resolved to die voluntarily when he
felt that he had lost the tranquil mind which
alone, in his belief, makes life tolerable.
It almost happened that Lucretius' poem was
entirely lost. Emperor Augustus, who tried to
restitute ancient religion stigmatized Lucretius,
whose memory vanished subsequently, and all but one
manuscript of his poems was destroyed. The epoch of
the Renaissance meant also the revival of
Lucretius, who has since been considered one of the
greatest poets of world literature. He was admired
by Milton, Shelley and Walt Whitman, whose
'Apostrophe to Death" may be traced to his reading
of Lucretius. Alfred Tennyson, relying on Jerome,
made Lucretius the object of a pathological
study.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
III.
SKEPTICISM
Skepticism appeared as a contemporary of
Epicureanism and Stoicism. The founder of
Skepticism is Pyrrho of Elis (365?-275 B.C.).
Carneades is the sytemizer of probabilism. Sextus
Empiricus (who lived at the beginning of the
Christian era) returned to the purer Skepticism of
Pyrrho.
Doctrine
Skeptics hold that the wise man can be assured
of the greatest degree of quietude and happiness by
renouncing all desires. Moreover, they hold that it
is impossible to reach truth with absolute
certainty because sensations vary from individual
to individual. Neither the Stoic criterion nor the
Epicurean evidence can change this natural behavior
of sensation. Since complete renunciation would be
impossible to maintain in practice, the Skeptics
had recourse to probabilism; of two opposites the
Skeptic accepts the one which seems more
efficacious.
Summary
Skepticism is the philosophy of doubt. Since we
have no means of knowing the true nature of things,
we have a degree of probability, a perceptual
clearness. This position led to Eclecticism.
Elsewhere On the
Internet
Pyrrho
of Ellis (c.
360-c. 270 B.C.)
Pyrrho was born in Ellis, Greece and he is known
as the founder of Pyrrhonism, which is generally
regarded as the foundation of Skepticism. His
opinions are known from the writings of his pupil,
Timon of Phlius. He taught that we can know nothing
of the nature of things, but that the best attitude
of mind is suspense of judgment, which brings with
it calmness of mind.
Anecdotes are told of his indifference to
disaster, including that many times his friends had
to save him from accidental falls. He was said to
have been in the company of Alexander the Great
when he reached the border of India and learned his
attitude of detachment from the "gymnosophists,"
the naked philosophers.
In one well-told incident, Pyrrho was mocked for
being alarmed by a fierce dog which chased him, but
Pyrrho said that it was difficult to strip off
human nature. He attempted to maintain tranquility
by balancing any plausible-sounding thesis with its
plausible opposite, and binding himself to nture,
custom, impulse, and craft-discipline without
affirming any thesis to be true.
Elsewhere On The
Internet
Arcesilaus
(c. 315-240 B.C.)
From 270 to 240 B.C., Arcesilaus directed the
Platonic Academy at Athens and helped it to regain
its former splendor. During his administration, the
doctrine of the Academy turned to a skepticism
similar to that of Pyrrho and Timon, although it
had developed independently of them and was
somewhat milder in form.
Arcesilaus studied mathematics with Autolycus, a
predecessor of Euclid at Sardes, Asia Minor. He was
also an experienced musician, and a brilliant
speaker and teacher. He regarded himself as the
true disciple of Plato, haranguing against
Speusippus and Xenocrates whom he accused of
distorting Plato's doctrines. According to
Arcesilaus, the correct understanding of Plato
results in doubt, suspension of judgment, and a
complete spiritual freedom equivalent to the
supreme good. With a vehemence equal to that of
other Platonists, Arcesilaus attacked the Stoics,
who, in turn, severely criticized him. Epicurus was
the only contemporary philosopher he acknowledged.
Only a few sayings of Arcesilaus are extant.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
Carneades
(c. 214-129 B.C.)
Carneades (picture)
was born in Cyrene, North Africa. A radical
skeptic, he was the first of the philosophers to
pronounce the failure of metaphysicians who
endeavored to discover rational meanings in
religious beliefs. By 159 B.C. he had begun to
refute all dogmatic doctrines, particularly
Stoicism; nor did he spare the Epicureans as
previous skeptics had done. The original theory of
probability that he developed was profound and of
great consequence. While he attacked the efforts of
the Stoics to reconcile popular religions with
their philosophical convictions, he also denied the
immortality of the gods, their superhuman
qualities, pantheism, fatalism, and providence. He
refused to accept moral values as absolute,
although he taught the necessity of learning how to
conduct one's life in an artful manner by combining
sagacity and reflective thought. In his practical
ethics, he professed a moderate Platonism, devoid
of all religious or metaphysical elements. He
founded the third or New Academy. However, his
philosophy had very little in common with Plato,
the original founder of the Academy.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
Sextus
Empiricus (c.
200 A.D.)
The writings of Sextus Empiricus (picture)
are an arsenal of skepticism which has furnished
pagan thinkers with weapons to combat Christianity,
Christian apologists with arguments to refute
paganism, and, in later centuries, philosophers
like Montaigne with reasons in defense of the
independence of their minds on dogmatism of any
kind.
Sextus, a physician by profession, was not so
much an original thinker as an informed
popularizer, a skillful and vigorous writer, who
was able to summarize his thoughts by striking
formulas. He attacked not only dogmatic
philosophers and theologians but any expert,
whether of mathematics or grammar, who claimed
infallibility. In this way he has also given highly
valuable information about the history of various
sciences such as they had developed in his
time.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
IV.
ECLECTICISM
When Macedonia was conquered by the Romans, and
Greece became a Roman province, Greek culture
penetrated Roman thinking and the Romans became
eclectic. They took from different systems what
appealed to them, and modified it to suit their
tastes.
Beliefs
Eclecticism is a form of Skepticism. It denies
that there are absolute truths and accepts, for
practical purposes, what seems the better in
different and opposite systems.
The fragments of conflicting thought are
selected and organized into a comprehensive system
of compatible knowledge presenting an expansion of
the world-views. Eclectic thinking weakened
dogmatism and encouraged intellectualism.
Elsewhere On the
Internet
V.
UNCLASSIFIED PHILOSOPHERS
Euclid
(c. 335-275 B.C.)
Hippocrates and Euclid (picture)
were regarded as the most popular scientists of
classical antiquity, but no ancient author made
note of even the slightest biographical detail of
the latter. From Euclid's own statements and from
the earliest allusions to his writings by Greek
scholars, it may be concluded that he lived during
the reign of Ptolemy I of Egypt (305-285 B.C.).
Euclid's Stoicheia (Elements) are the
basis of the mathematical sciences of both ancient
and modern times. He did not perform all, and
perhaps not even a large portion of the discoveries
he systematized in his book. But certainly he
corrected, amplified, and developed many of the
propositions made by predecessors. He gave to
mathematics the form which was maintained until the
nineteenth century, and he established a standard
of scientific exactitude retained by scholars
active in all branches of science, even though
entirely new concepts of mathematics were current.
Philosophers have tried to imitate Euclid's methods
of demonstration. The philosophy of Spinoza is the
most famous example of the application of Euclid's
manner. Euclid was well acquainted with Greek
philosophy. His fundamental views were derived from
Plato, but he also studied the works of Aristotle
and his disciples.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
Posidonius
(c.135-51
B.C.)
The remnants of the works of Posidonius
(picture) consist of
sentences which have been quoted by later authors.
In his time and by many succeeding generations, he
was esteemed as the most learned scholar who was
able to present dry matter in a popular, even
picturesque style. Posidonius was born in Syria but
taught mostly on the island of Rhodes and at Rome.
He traveled through North Africa, Spain, France and
Italy and wrote on philosophy, history, geography,
physics, and astronomy. Religion played an
important part in his thinking. He revered the
Greek, Roman, and Oriental gods and rites, and
combined the beliefs in the gods and demons with
the traditional Stoic pantheism. His picture of the
Universe, though preserved in fragments only,
influenced many thinkers of the Middle Ages and the
Renaissance, and his sayings, which blend reason
with mysticism, sober experience with daring
conjectures, inspired Leibnitz and the
romanticists.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
To Page
Two
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Book...
|