|
Illuminism
Giovanni
Battista Vico
Historicalism or
Traditionalism Based on Universal
Culture
Giovanni Battista Vico (1668-1744) (picture)
was born in Naples. Self-educated, a lecturer and
professor at the University of Naples, he was also
historian for Charles III of Bourbon. Vico rose in
sharp opposition against Illuminism and Cartesian
Rationalism, and advocated in their stead a new
science ("scienza nuova"), history. Vico expounded
the principles of history for the first time in a
work entitled Principi di una scienza vuova
d'intorno alla natural delle nazioni
(Principles of a New Science concerning the Nature
of Nations).
The fundamental principle of Vico's "scienza
nuova" is: The criterion of knowledge of a thing is
its being effected. "Verum upsum factum -- verum
factum convertuntur." Thus only the knowledge of
things which are being done is certain. Now,
since what man has done or is in the process of
doing is history, man can have true knowledge only
of history. By proclaiming history as fundamental
knowledge, Vico opposes:
- Illuminism: Illuminism denied that
history has any value at all. Vico says that
history is the only object of which man can have
certain knowledge.
- The physics of Galileo and Newton:
Galileo and Newton held that only the knowledge
of nature is true science. Vico holds that
physics is the science of phenomena, not
of the essence of nature, which is known
only by God, its Author.
- Cartesian Rationalism: Vico
particularly opposed the rationalism of
Descartes. Descartes begins with "Cogito ergo
sum," and constructs the knowable through
mathematical deduction. Vico observes that the
"cogito ergo sum" indeed manifests the
fact of actual thought as the present
state of our being, but does not give us the
understanding or science of our being. As
for mathematical deduction, it is true that it
gives us absolute certitude. However, this
certitude is not based on the experience of
reality but on abstract concepts formed by our
intellect under the guidance of our will.
Only history gives us true science or knowledge.
Like mathematics it reveals the fabric of man's
actions; and unlike mathematics, it is
concerned, not with an abstract and fictitious
sphere, but with the field of concrete
reality.
History, considered in its entire process or
current, takes the place of metaphysical being, the
object of philosophy. According to Vico, history,
under the surface of facts succeeding one another
apparently arbitrarily, manifests the presence of
providence, which directs these apparently
contradictory and unrelated facts to the end
intended by God; namely, the progressive
development of humanity. The laws regulating the
course of human events can be grasped only by the
intellect. Starting from the knowledge of
contingent facts (philology), the intellect
discerns the connection of these facts with eternal
principles. Thus Vico establishes the bond between
philology (the knowledge of facts) and philosophy
(the explanation of these facts in reference to the
laws of providence).
Vico summarizes these laws in two theories: (1)
the theory of the three stages; (2) the theory of
repetition in history (history repeats itself).
According to the first theory, every period of
history comprises three different stages. In the
theoretical or speculative order these stages are
sense, fantasy, and reason. In the moral order they
are the age of the gods, the age of heroes, and the
age of men. This triad indicates the birth, growth
and decay of a historical period. When such a
period is completed, a new cycle of three stages
will follow, but with this difference, that the
succeeding cycle is on a higher plane than the
former. This is Vico's second theory of the
repetition of history.
Vico was a Catholic, and of course admits belief
in God, creation, revelation, and providence in the
traditional Catholic sense. However, if, according
to his principle, only that which is made by man is
knowable, then God, who is not the product of human
activity, would be unknowable. This explains why
the Scienza nuova was not received by the
cultural world for a long time. Later Idealism (as
in Croce) accepted it, however, because in it there
is set a precedent for explaining concrete reality
idealistically, that is, through an immanent
dialectic dynamic principle, without having
recourse to any transcendent Being.
As Padovani writes:
- Where Vico made an original contribution and
won consideration as a philosopher is in his
discovery of the moment of fantasy
proper to man and early humanity. The moment of
fantasy is a spontaneous synthesis of sense and
reason speaking through the sensible. From this
arises language, poetry, and myth. This moment
of fantasy is not entirely false, nor is it a
'post factum' or reflex clothing for
metaphysical speculation; but it is a moment
when reason manifests itself immediately and
spontaneously through sense perception.
-
- As a concrete illustration of this
interpretation of primitive civilization, Vico
makes particular mention of the Homeric poems.
Denying the historical personality of the Blind
Poet, Vico considers these poems as representing
the initial mythical, poetic and fanciful moment
of Grecian civilization.
Quote from U.A. Padovani, Story of
Philosophy, II, 163.
Return to The
Philosophy of Illuminism
|
The
New Science of Giambattista
Vico,
by
Giovanni Battista Vico
|